With Marlee Matlin, Elaine Hendrix, John Ross Bowie, Robert Bailey Jr.. A fictional photographer's quest to spiritually rediscover herself is interspersed with documentary footage of scientists and theologians discussing the philosophical aspects of quantum physics. It went on to say that "Most laypeople cannot tell where the quantum physics ends and the quantum nonsense begins, and many are susceptible to being misguided," and that "a physics student may be unable to convincingly confront unjustified extrapolations of quantum mechanics," a shortcoming which the authors attribute to the current teaching of quantum mechanics, in which "we tacitly deny the mysteries physics has encountered". A disproportionate amount of time was given in voice and film to Ramtha, Dr. Joe dispenza, and Miceal Ledwith. But she is right about us not seeing things in front of our eyes if we're not looking for them. You may or may not believe that there's an external reality beyond what your brain creates; the topic will be a perennial and fertile source of discussion. (Physicists should take part of the blame for this confusion. [9] In his review, Dave Kehr of The New York Times described the "transition from quantum mechanics to cognitive therapy" as "plausible", but stated also that "the subsequent leapfrom cognitive therapy into large, hazy spiritual beliefsisn't as effectively executed. It demands a freedom of view and greatness of thought so far unknown, indeed, not even dreamed of since Copernicus. And if you really want to be friendly, ask me about "The Case forPluto.". It took a while, but the comparison finally came through on the association of strings, as a quantum mechanical perspective, and the relationship to that movie. But above a tiny size range, quantum properties collapse, and particles start to behave in the way described by classical physics - more like bowling balls than fuzzy clouds of "wave functions. And while I'm no quantum physicist, my yoga teacher a big fan of the movie was starting to sound like she was. Q. The question is, how far down the rabbit hole, do you wanna go?
MOVIE: What the #$*!(bleep) do we know | Physics Forums "I think the point is that Feynman realized that people can be fooled, but nature can't.". Dr Candice Pert As the layers to her everyday experiences fall away insertions in the story with scientists, and philosophers and religious leaders . The film surpassed all expectations; it was certainly the stupidest thing I can remember seeing in a movie theater, and thats saying quite a lot (I see a lot of movies).
How to spot quantum quackery - NBC News was heavily criticised for being "a documentary aimed at the totally gullible". That beliefs about who one is and what is real are a direct cause of oneself and of one's own realities. In 1958 nasa started mapping the ocean and exploring it. All those things can be attributed to quantum mechanics first of all, because it's so poorly understood by the public, and especially because it's so verifiably weird. If anyone has any information to refute any of the facts laid out here, I will be more then willing to retract them. The movie gives two examples of experiments which have shown the power of the mind affecting reality. To date, there has been no response as to where the information which lead to the story about the indians not being able to see the ships of Columbus originated from. Some movies are so bad, they're funny.
What the Bleep Do We Know!? 2004 Particles Popping Into & Out of Existence. The narrative follows a fictional photographer, Amanda, through her emotional and existential journey of life. Short Range Tests of Newtons Inverse-Square Law. There are also phrases plagiarized entire from "The Matrix," a far superior film treatment of the notion that reality isn't what it seems. Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Hidden Dimensions, Rachels Musings Rabbit Holes and Other Oddities, Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Philosophy of Science on Blogginheads.tv, For "The Baby Goes Out With The Bathwater" Crowd - SLUniverse Forums. unless you renew or Our mind has enormous potential, but we only use a small part of it for conscious thought, and we miss a lot of what's going on around us so, in a leap of creatively edited logic 3.
What Does The Movie "What The Bleep Do We Know" Mean? | Teaching of That would be, very hard to quantify:). (stylized as What t #$*! Then we segue to a narrative starring Amanda (Marlee Maitlin), a wedding photographer who's bummed because her slimy husband cheated on her. Pingback: Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Down the Rabbit Hole. In the film, during a discussion of the influence of experience on perception, Candace Pert notes a story, which she says she believes is true, of Native Americans being unable to see Columbus's ships because they were outside their experience. Some argue that the same quantum processes seen in the universe around us have an effect on consciousness as well, but physicist Lawrence Krauss says that's highly debatable. Is that last line The fact that someone who spouts such utter nonsense can get a Ph.D. from Harvard and be one of the most widely cited authors on supersymmetric models is pretty remarkable some sort of strange attack on SUSY models? Hobbs also discusses Hagelin's experiment with Transcendental Meditation and the Washington DC rate of violent crime, saying that "the number of murders actually went up". log out. Hagelin might be crazy, but some of those papers are co-written by John Ellis and other respectable people. 1. This website uses cookies to
[PDF] What the Bleep Do We Know ? | Semantic Scholar Q: Why do you think that people have seized upon this? His list of "worst abusers" includes inspirational author Deepak Chopra, the best-selling book "The Secret" and the whole field of Transcendental Meditation. Not exactly, Amit. to someone you know:
Puppymonkeybaby proves Rubio talking point Obama is destroying Even so it notched up $10m in.
What The Bleep Do We Know | PDF | Reality | Brain - Scribd ft. indoor riding arena once used for horse training which was refurbished and floored . Bleep was conceived and its production funded by William Arntz, who co-directed the film along with Betsy Chasse and Mark Vicente; all three were students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment. But quantum-mechanical computers might be able to, and then of course we'd have to start thinking about how to make things more secure. Blending New Age mysticism and quantum physics, What The Bleep Do We Know?! Skeptic James Randi described the film as "a fantasy docudrama" and "[a] rampant example of abuse by charlatans and cults". Knight's compound outside the town of Yelm has been built over the former horse-breeding grounds: The estate consists of JZ's present home, a white 12,800 square foot French chateau styled 4-bedroom house, her original home (a 1,600 sq. By clicking 'Send to a friend' you agree ABC Online is not responsible for the content contained in your email message.
The figures are a bit rubbery, but the idea that we're only 'aware' of a fraction of our brain's activity is both correct and a huge relief. logged you out. Matt, what is so nutty about Serge Langs ideas about HIV and AIDS? Featuring two (!) Even though there's lots of proof that the Moon landing happened, some people don't . you refer to the offspring of hep-ph/9803315. Unfortunately hes written no papers after 1995, see, http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/find/hep/www?rawcmd=find+a+hagelin&FORMAT=WWW&SEQUENCE=.
16 Quotes From the Movies ideas - Pinterest Whether or not you buy into its "you are God in the making" philosophy, "What the Bleep Do We Know?" In addition to the films three directors, there were actors and others involved in the production who are long time "students" of Ramthas' School of enlightenment. Dr Joe Dispenza (the one who creates his day) has gone to court and testified that his teacher (ramtha) has told him that terrible times are coming and that he needs to protect his family. Invariably only about half the people tested ever notice a woman in a gorilla suit walking across the middle of the screen during the game. Of Hagelins thousands of citations, how many are from the Ellis/Nanopoulous et al paper mill? Quantum physics tells us that reality isn't fixed subatomic particles only come into existence when they are observed, 2. The reason you should be suspicious is because we don't even understand classical consciousness. It's hard to say where Candace Pert got the low-down on what the Native American Indians did or didn't see when Columbus and the gang hit the horizon. While Amanda waits for a commuter train, she (and we) are shown the work of Japanese scientist Masaru Emoto, who has photographed water after exposing it to different emotions. No, that wasnt intended specifically as an attack on supersymmetric models; the fact that Hagelin worked on them isnt an argument for or against them. [4] The visual-effects team, led by Evan Jacobs, worked closely with the other film-makers to create visual metaphors that would capture the essence of the film's technical subjects with attention to aesthetic detail. But that doesn't mean that astrology is true. and of course the big guy himself, Ramtha. That's its claim anyway.
What the Bleep Do We Know?: Discovering the Endless - Amazon Even followers of spiritual traditions that believe in worldly illusion will have problems with "Bleep." It's there. Categories conflate, confound, connect", "Our power is in our ability to decide - Can you? Yet, the battle still ranges, and we now know where we can class the distinctions of LQG and String theorists? She's averse to churches (she married her husband in one, so they must be bad!
( ) - What the bleep Do we know Isnt that a bit like attacking algebra because of Serge Langs nutty ideas about HIV and AIDS? What the Bleep Do We Know was directed and produced by Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente and William Arntz, all of whom were students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment.
What the Bleep Do We Know!? - Wikipedia "[10], What the Bleep Do We Know!? Several books have been written about the film's remarkable grassroots marketing campaign, which led to its unprecedented success. I started out thinking that BLEEP 2 would be a ground-breaking update covering ideas and discoveries in quantum physics, brain neurology and consciousness studies introduced over a decade ago. [11], Scientists who have reviewed What the Bleep Do We Know!? [an error occurred while processing this directive]. You can't bring good things to you by thinking about them. ", "The movie is saying that somehow we can all get together and, with our collective thought processes, we can influence the outcome" of physical events - be they life experiences or scientific experiments, notes Bruce Schumm, a particle physicist at the University of California at Santa Cruz.
What The Bleep Do We Know - 4minutes TRAILER - YouTube Update: More information at the end of the video description.Comment approval now removed. We'll never know. Here's an edited transcript: Cosmic Log: Every once in a while, you'll hear about something like "The Secret," or some other reference to quantum mechanics as explaining how you can change your universe, or even perhaps why it's in the realm of possibility that a globe-gobbling black hole could be created because "anything can happen" in quantum mechanics. While many of its interviewees and subjects are professional scientists in the fields of physics, chemistry, and biology, one of them has noted that the film quotes him out of context. You are free to comment as you wish. HCI president Peter Vegso stated that in regard to this book, "What the Bleep is the quantum leap in the New Age world," and "by marrying science and spirituality, it is the foundation of future thought."[5]. A: Absolutely. Thanks to Pylon Sentinel for pointing this out.A link to his Wikipedia page is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Alan_Wolf
Ramtha - JZ Knight - The Skeptic's Dictionary - Skepdic.com If it's true, no one's been able to measure it or see the effects. Interspersed with Amanda's woes and the pseudoscience are random attacks on organized religion. There appears to be no evidence to support this claim. Pingback: yeago works Blog Archive Jesus, Buddha, Ken Wilber??
What the bleep are they on about? Science Features (ABC Science) So far, so good. 4000 volunteers regularly meditated to achieve a 25% drop in violent crime by the end of summer. How had the discussion from WTB (What the BLEEP) moved and evolved? As the sample size grows, so does the scientist's confidence in the statistical inferences drawn from the large sample. Scientists in the physical realm also hypothesize that matter is solid (Wilson 5). The sub-atomic particles that make up the atoms that make up the rock are there too." Krauss has dealt with factual and fictional weirdness for decades as the author of "The Physics of Star Trek," as the head of Arizona State University's Origins Project, and as the author of a "Quantum Man," a soon-to-be-published biography of pioneering physicist Richard Feynman.
BBC - Movies - review - What The Bleep Do We Know!? DVD or call us at 1-617-450-2300. There are also controlled, double-blind prayer studies out there much more interesting than the D.C. crime study cited in the film, though not necessarily more convincing. Mark was born in Johannesburg, South Africa . ISHEAGU MASSACRE HISTORICAL BACKGROUND: Isheagu is a town whose origin is traceable to the Eastern part of the contraption called Nigeria. You can be accurate in one or the other, but not in both. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Cathleen Falsani, who must have been taking notes while I was staring gobsmacked at the screen, quotes the 35,year-old . What the Bleep Do We Know postulates the existence of a spiritual connection between the realms of quantum physics and consciousness, demonstrating this through inspiring visual effects, story-telling and interviews with experts. "What the Bleep Do We Know," a pseudoscientific docudrama that purports to link quantum mechanics and consciousness, would be a riot if people didn't take it so seriously. At some point I guess he updated it to string field theory and the version you provided a link for. so much for no good or bad, that is unless it is convienent. Q: Obviously, quantum mechanics has lots of real-life applications, including in your television set and your microwave oven. [4], Lacking the funding and resources of the typical Hollywood film, the filmmakers relied on "guerrilla marketing" first to get the film into theaters, and then to attract audiences. suggest that science allows you to capitalize on quantum possibilities, but theoretical physicist Lawrence Krauss says it's just a load of bleep. Despite his caveats, he recommends that people see the film, stating: "I hope it develops into a cult movie in the UK as it has in the US. The sub-atomic particles that make up the atoms that make up the rock are there too.
On the whole they were a bunch of complete flakes, although one of them (David Albert) is a philosopher of science here at Columbia. That's not the case. It is true that quantum mechanics is extremely strange, and on extremely small scales for short times, all sorts of weird things happen. John Hagelin was obviously a good phenomenologists. "But that's two leaps beyond what scientists believe to be true.". I think its a good idea for people to consider the example of Hagelin: hes completely delusional and has zero common sense, but able to function at a high level in the particle theory community. You see my physics students don't understand it. That is because I don't understand it. We use it to assign probabilities to possible measurement outcomes on the basis of actual measurement outcomes. One possible answer: they go to an alternative universe where people are asking the same question: 'where'd they go?'" It was really hard to sit through. Whether you're religious, spiritual, or none of the above, you can say one thing for this movie: it's an equal-opportunity offender. subscription. There were many more, but I will leave them for others. He claims the drop was achieved. "What the Bleep" begins in NOVA-like fashion: galaxies swirl and scientists--we aren't told who they are until the end--expound on quantum mechanics and the nature of the universe. When they use the word 'observe', they actually mean 'interact with', not look at or think about.). Initially, the film was released in only two theaters: one in Yelm, Washington (the home of the producers, which is also the home of Ramtha), and the other the Bagdad Theater in Portland, Oregon, where it was filmed.
Moon landing conspiracy theories aren't true - here's how we know Dr. Jeffrey Satinover (psychiatrist, PhD candidate in physics), in What the Bleep Do We Know? Awash in New Age theorizing, real world science and the intellectually unfathomable notion of quantum mechanics, What the 'Bleep' Do We Know!? Nasa found something. The meditation may not have helped the victims of violent crime, but it did win Hagelin the 1994 Ig Nobel Peace Prize. But when animated, jive-talkin' human cells start dancing around in what appears to be the heroine's frontal lobe, all questions of spirituality pale before the sheer dreadfulness of this movie. Everything from the possibility of disappearing and reappearing, to the possibility of having strange new forms of communication. First, such claims rely on "hidden variables" susceptible to influence, he says. He also has been marketing several products within the school and its followers. So you forgive the film's jelly-baby graphics, daggy storyline, and that Gabor sister channelling a warrior spirit from Atlantis. "What the Bleep" misses opportunities to focus credibly on the fascinating work people like Newberg have been doing, and makes the science-and-faith field seem like quackery. Never mind that the movie didnt even have a plot. He says he is "profoundly unsympathetic to attempts at linking quantum mechanics with consciousness".[1].
: !? - RuTracker.org But I start to choke on my $8 popcorn when science is manipulated to make a cult leader's claims sound more plausible. 3.
WHAT THE BLEEP DO WE KNOW?! - American Chemical Society It's there. !" is a radical departure from convention. We believe news can and should expand a sense of identity and possibility beyond narrow conventional expectations.
The movie "What the Bleep do we know" How much is true, or just 3. 2004 ( ) ( ) Offline 2013.
What the 'Bleep'!?:Down The Rabbit Hole - DVD Talk Down The Rabbit Hole\". Mon August 23, 2021: The US Food and Drug Administration on Monday granted full approval to the Pfizer/BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine for people age 16 and older. In fact, "you are God in the making," which explains why Shirley MacLaine is a Ramtha fan. Your subscription to Sol. "Your mind can't tell the difference between what it sees and what it remembers" Dr Joseph Dispenza (Chiropractor ) in What the Bleep Do We Know? The following persons in the film have all spoken at RSE and sold books there. [16], David Albert, a philosopher of physics who appears in the film, has accused the filmmakers of selectively editing his interview to make it appear that he endorses the film's thesis that quantum mechanics is linked with consciousness. Do we know" . Therefore people get the notion that there's no objective reality, and that you can literally impact on the external world just by doing things internally.